body style="margin-left: 70px;margin-right: 70px;margin-top: 70pt;margin-bottom: 70pt;">
Jerusalem News 873. Views, Jews, Ten Tribes News
22 August 2009, 3 Elul 5769
Contents:
1. Palestinians to be sent to Sinai or Algeria?
2. Sweden: No Condemnation of 'Stolen Organs' Libel
3. Sweden: Gothic Lies About Judah
1. Palestinians to be sent to Sinai or
Algeria?
From: Steven Shamrak <stevenshamrak.e@gmail.com>
re Ten Tribes Tribal Report no.27
http://www.britam.org/TR/TR27.html#The
#3. The Jews and Britain: Judah and Ephraim at Odds?
Re: "Shamrak is based in Australia and advocates transferring the Pesltinians to
Sinai.
To our minds this proposal is impractical and all the Palestinians should
instead be flown to North Africa or South America."
- Is it more practical? :)
Steven Shamrak
www.shamrak.com
Brit-Am Reply:
Brit-Am believes in
sending the Arabs in the Land of Israel (from the Nile to the Euphrates) to
someplace in the west in North Africa such as Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, or
alternatively to South America.
This is based on our understanding of Isaiah 11:14
http://www.britam.org/isaiah/Isaiah11to15.html#11
Isaiah indicates that Judah and Ephraim will undertake a joint project to fly
the Palestinians out to the west.
See:
Transfer of Arabs. Options for Survival
A Solution to the War In Gaza
http://www.britam.org/hamas.html
We suggest North Africa since according
to tradition some of their Canaanite predecessors who were driven out of the
Land of Canaan by Israelite went to North Africa which was intended for them.
In North Africa there is plenty of room, a Mediterranean climate, and fertile
lands waiting to be cultivated.
There is also a populace that speaks the same language as the Palestinians do,
shares their religion and cultural values, etc.
Steven
Shamrak
relates only to the Palestinians in the State of Israel (Including presumably
Judah and Samaria) and suggests that they should go to Sinai.
He implies that his suggestion is more practical.
We disagree:
Sinai is part of the Promised Land and should belong to the Jews or at least to
other Israelites not to heathen Ishmaelite
and their Canaanite kin.
Sinai is not much different from Gaza. Just as the Arabs in Gaza cause problems
for the Jews so will they do if they are in Sinai.
If the Arabs were placed in Sinai they would begin moving back as soon as they
could. Even now the Beduin
in Sinai cannot be prevented from smuggling drugs, arms, prostitutes, and
terrorists into the State of Israel.
Sinai is not really suitable to absorb a large body of people, at least not
without a major infrastructure development.
Physically putting people on buses etc and moving them to Sinai could be more
difficult than putting them on a plane and flying them away.
The problem is not really the physical
one.
In order to make the transfer of Arabs
feasible public opinion must be prepared to countenance it.
This could be done.
World public opinion is now in favor of transferring Jews out of Judah and
Samaria despite the injustice and evil intention of the very concept. In the
same way feasibility studies and positive publicity could be applied to the Arab
problem.
Public opinion in certain key areas could be prepared to accept a movement of
Arabs into North Africa and away from the Middle East.
2. Sweden: No Condemnation of 'Stolen
Organs' Libel
by Maayana Miskin
Follow Israel news on and .
(IsraelNN.com) The Swedish government distanced itself Thursday from an
ambassador's condemnation of an article accusing Israeli troops of stealing
Palestinian Authority Arabs' organs. The Swedish Foreign Ministry clarified
that, unlike Ambassador to Israel Elisabet Borsiin Bonnier, it does not view the
article as "appalling."
Bonnier's condemnation "was solely the judgment of the embassy, and designed for
an Israeli audience," the ministry said. "However, the Swedish government is
committed to freedom of the press."
A government spokesman confirmed that Sweden's government did not agree with
ambassador Bonnier's response. Members of Sweden's Green Party went further, and
said Bonnier should be called back to Sweden for having made statements opposing
free speech.
Bonnier termed the article "shocking and appalling," and said, "freedom of the
press and freedom of expression are freedoms which carry a certain
responsibility."
Israeli officials condemned the article as well, and accused its writers of
encouraging hate crimes. "This article has clear elements of medieval blood
libels against Jews," Foreign Ministry officials said.
The article, printed in the Swedish paper Aftonbladet, claims that the IDF has
been removing organs from PA Arab youth killed in combat or terrorist operations
since the early 1990s. The author of the article, Donald Bostrom, admitted
Wednesday that he did not know whether or not the story was true.
The editor of Aftonbladet has rejected criticism of the article, and accused his
opponents of "using centuries-old anti-Semitic images," such as that of European
blood libels, "in an apparent attempt to get an obviously topical issue off the
table." The editor, Jan Helin, said that "a strong propaganda machine" was
behind the appalled reactions to the story.
Brit-Am Comment:
Re Sweden
In Sweden a strong current of anti-Semitism has always existed.
In WW2 Sweden gave shelter to Jewish refugees from Denmark and prominent Swedes
helped both the Jews and the Allied cause.
On the other hand Swedish industry (steel goods, ball-bearings, weapons, etc)
got rich supplying the Third Reich and Jewish refugees on the whole were not
welcome.
Swedish intellectuals also participated in the propagation of racial supremacist
ideology that laid the groundwork for Nazism.
Re the Blood Libel
The blood libel emanates from the Palestinians and was merely picked up a
Swedish reprobate and given a propaganda push by a left-wing publication. The
Left-wingers do this all the time.
What was said is in effect not much worse than what conspiracy freak Barry
Chamish
has been saying and getting away with it even receiving backing from Jewish
right-wingers and Ephraimite
closet anti-Semites.
One when allows lies and libels to be
published such as those emanating from the Palestinian Nazis or from Conspiracy
Freaks then it is only a matter of time before they are picked up and spread
further by the mainstream or semi-Mainstream media.
3. Sweden: Gothic Lies About Judah
From: Women in Green <wfit2@womeningreen.org>
Stop the Presses: Blood Libel Goes Mainstream:
Swedish Newspaper Proves Antisemitism Is Anti-Zionism Is Now Acceptable
By Barry Rubin
August 19, 2009
Extracts:
We are not talking about a Saudi newspaper or Hamas radio station
but a Swedish newspaper. We are not talking about a neo-Nazi rag but a daily
closely tied to the Swedish Social Democratic Party. And we are not just talking
about an obscure item but an article that received top billing.
On August 18, Aftonbladet, Sweden's largest newspaper which claims 1.5 million
readers, published an article by a man named Donald Bostrom. The editor
responsible is named Asa Linderborg. She is the newspaper's cultural affairs'
editor.
This was no random decision for her. When asked once: "What do you wish for most
in life right now?" She answered: "What a simple question. What I want is a free
Palestine."
And what did this article say? That Israel's army deliberately kidnaps
Palestinian civilians and then murders them so it can cut out and sell their
organs to sick people needing transplants.
The Swedish story is based on Palestinian sources (though the author also claims
he has UN sources for it)--like so many slanders of Israel which are widely
purveyed. It is easy to forget that the false claim of a Jenin massacre--which
received massive coverage in the Western media--was based on an interview with a
single Palestinian who nobody even knew.
Palestinians simply told him that the bodies of terrorists or others killed came
back with organs missing. Any photos, medical records, documented complaints? Of
course not.
[Ironically, the Beirut Daily Star has a
very responsible article, with no claim of Israeli involvement, on the issue of
organ sales.]
[Also ironically in Lebanon its
the PLO who drained all of the blood out of the still living bodies of Lebanese
hospital patients to replenish supplies for their own wounded, Brit-Am editor.]
At this point you are no doubt thinking: This is some kind of sick joke.
Yes, it is. But the newspaper published it any way.
Apparently, the author is a left-wing activist for Palestinian causes, though
the newspaper calls him a journalist.
[By the way, this is not the first time
such accusations have been made. In the Turkish film, "Valley of the Wolves,"
Gary Busey
played an American Jewish doctor who was stealing the organs of Iraqis for the
United States and Israel. Note that the Turkish prime minister praised the film,
that it was shown to large Muslim audiences in Holland and elsewhere in Europe,
and that a friend who saw it in Syria noticed people crying in the theatre at
the sight of such evil behavior. Have no doubt: many thousands of people who saw
the film believe this accusation to be true.]
To show how typical this is, Radio Sweden has just broadcast once again the
claim that Israel murdered Muhammad Dura, a little boy who may or may not have
been killed in the Gaza Strip by Israeli or Fatah bullets. The only proof of
these claims was a very suspicious video (other parts of which show Palestinians
rehearsing for the show) which a French court has determined to be a fraud. That
court decision went unmentioned by Swedish radio.
As Ralph Haglund points out, a Swedish radio Middle East correspondent said he
is always ready to take the word of Hamas over that of Israel.
To paraphrase Shakespeare, Something is rotten in the state of Sweden.
At least, though, the competing newspaper, Svenska Dagbladet, has blasted the
article which it says is an antisemitic blood libel without a shred of evidence.
What does this incident tell us? One thing is that there is no limit to the
insanity of how Israel is treated nowadays in so many supposedly responsible,
left-wing, and intellectual circles.
It also tells us that anyone of decency and good intentions should start
re-examining right now their credulity in accepting anti-Israel slanders,
nonsensical media or academic claims, or irresponsibly inaccurate "human rights"
group reports.
It also tells us that Jews who criticize Israel based on what they are being
taught at universities and what they see in the media need to think about what
they are doing. And, yes, all this bashing and chipping away at Israel's
reputation; this unfair blaming; this blindness toward the goals, behavior, and
ideology of radical Islamist forces and Palestinian intransigence is promoting
an antisemitism beyond anything seen in the Western world since 1945.
The time has come to realize that antisemitism, anti-Zionism, absurd
misrepresentation of Israel and the effort to wipe it off the map are all
tightly intertwined.
We have seen the rise of a systematic industry in wild anti-Israel claims by
Palestinians which are repeated without evidence by the Western news media and
others.
Yet this type of story about ghoulish Israeli monsters is actually rather
typical nowadays. The basic methodology in the Swedish case is like that of
dozens of others, only in this case the specific accusation was too lurid to win
wide acceptance in the West (though not in much of the Arabic-speaking and
Muslim majority world).
The recipe is simple: Palestinians make up charges, tell them to sympathetic
reporters or academics or "human rights'" officials who don't demand evidence,
and then are widely spread through other willing executioners of truth whose low
degree of professionalism and high level of politicization make them conducive
to becoming collaborators in the enterprise.
Before Israeli officials can investigate and present a detailed
response--largely ignored by the media--they are all off to the next lurid
accusation.
The fact that none of these accusations is ever ultimately proven correct seems
to have no effect on the industry.
In a variation of this theme, a few days ago, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
publicly denounced, as if it was some sort of ethnic cleansing, the eviction of
two Palestinian families from an apartment building in Jerusalem. Apparently,
Palestinians had presented it as such to U.S. diplomats in Jerusalem.
In fact, as the public record clearly showed, this was merely the result of an
Israeli court decision following a long, detailed case lasting years, for
non-payment of rent. Palestinian families who paid rent in the building had no
problem at all.
The British newspaper of intellectuals and beautiful people, the Guardian,
carries an article which uses this incident, among other things, to claim that
Israel is a Nazi country. That's two families evicted for non-payment of rent,
not quite equivalent to seizing Austria and Czechoslovakia, invading all of
Europe, and murdering 12 million or so Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, Poles,
Russians, etc., etc.
In fact, when the Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein murdered tens of thousands
of Kurdish citizens in the 1990s or when the Syrian regime murdered 10,000 to
15,000 of its own citizens in Hamas in 1982, there was no outrage at all in the
West. There still isn't today.
After all, the hysterical misrepresentation of Israel increasingly seems to
parallel the tales of well-poisonings, ritual murders, and Zionist conspiracies
to seize world power of past eras.
http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/08/stop-presses-blood-libel-goes.html
=============================================
Women For Israel's Tomorrow (Women in Green)
POB 7352, Jerusalem 91072, Israel
Tel: 972-2-624-9887 Fax: 972-2-624-5380
mailto:wfit2@womeningreen.org
http://www.womeningreen.org
Pleased with what you read?
The Brit-Am enterprise is a Biblical work.
God willing, they who assist Brit-Am will be blessed.
Brit-Am depends on contributions alongside purchases of our publications
Click Here to make an offering.
Click Here to view our publications.
|
'It is impossible to rightly govern the
world without God or the Bible.'
George Washington
Brit-Am is the "still small voice" that contains the truth.
[1-Kings 19:12] AND AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE A FIRE; BUT THE LORD WAS NOT IN THE
FIRE: AND AFTER THE FIRE A STILL SMALL VOICE.
Home
