Dan and the Serpent Way.
Dan in Northern Israel, Greece, and Elsewhere


Discussion Group
Contents by Subject Home
Site Map
Contents in Alphabetical Order
This Site


Dan and the Serpent Way.
Dan in Northern Israel, Greece, and Elsewhere

identity cover

For references to the article below as well as more information on this and related matters, see our work

"Lost Israelite Identity.
The Hebrew Origin of Celtic Races

                The Tribe of Dan when it came out of Egypt with the rest of the Children of Israel  was, after Judah,  the most populous of Israelite Tribes with 62,700 males between the ages of 20 and 60 apart from  women, children, and the elderly (Numbers 2;26).

                The son of Dan was called "Hushim" (Genesis 46;23) who gave rise to the Danite clan known as Shuhami (Numbers 26;43). Symbols associated with the Tribe of Dan include a lion, snake, eagle, griffin, and dragon. Aholiab of the Tribe of Dan assisted Betzaleel of the Tribe of Judah in building the Tabernacle in the Wilderness (Exodus 31;2 6).

                Character appraisals of Dan in tradition appear contradictory. One source (Talmud, Shabat 67) says  that all the children of Dan were idolaters. It also says that Dan received the north side "whence darkness comes". A Midrash states that Samson the legendary judge hero had a Danite father and a mother from Judah whereas the future Messiah will have a father from Judah and a mother from Dan or from Nephtali (Genesis Rabah 98;13).

                The mother of Dan was Bilhah who also bore Nephtali. Dan and Nephtali are often linked with each other. We identify Napthtali with Norway and Dan with Denmark as well as in part Wales and Ireland. Bilhah was the maidservant of Rachel mother of Benjamin and Joseph, and here too parallelisms are noticeable.

                Eldad HaDani (ca.800 c.e.) quotes an old legend according to  which the Tribe of Dan left the Land of Israel after the Ten Tribes separated themselves from Judah. The Northern Ten Tribes under Jeroboam ben Nebat warred against Judah in the south and so Dan rather than engage in a fratricidal struggle went into voluntary exile.

                SAMSON was from the Tribe of Dan. Samson was an heroic saviour of superhuman strength given to him at moments of  Divine inspiration.. He became the prototype for Hercules. In Greek Classical Mythology Hercules appears to frequently represent peregrinations of migrating Phoenicians and Israelites.

                At first the Tribe of Dan received an inheritance around the area of Joppa (modern Jaffa- Tel Aviv). Most of the inheritance of Dan in the south was to be lost to the Amorites and Philistines and later regained by the Israelite Tribes of Ephraim and Judah BUT NOT DAN.
 "And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain: for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley:
"But the Amorites would dwell in Mount Heres in Aijalon, and in Shaalbim: yet the hand of the house of Joseph prevailed, so that they became tributaries" (Judges 2;34 35)..  

When Dan had been in the south they were unable to conquer all of the territory allotted to them and apparently moved off and it would seem that the forces of Joseph did manage to later take over the areas originally allotted to Dan.       
                 The Bible says that Danites from the south went out (northward) and conquered a place called Leshem (Joshua 19) that they renamed Dan: They did the same thing with another place called Laish (Judges chapter 18). It is often assumed that Laish and Leshem are different names for the same city but we will show that they were totally different areas.
The populous Tribe of Dan was to launch forward and conquer an area in the Upper Galilee, another region in Cilicia (southeast Turkey), establish settlements in Anatolia, engage in an attempted invasion of Egypt, establish a base in Libya, conquer Greece, Cyprus, and Crete, and establish a presence in Bronze Age Scandinavia, Britain, and Ireland.
See our article on the Northern borders of the Land of Israel in Biblical Times.
  It had been prophesied that Dan in his own way would become a formidable force:
"Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that bites the horse's heels, so that his rider shall fall backward. I wait for thy salvation, O LORD" (Genesis 49;16  17).

    "And of Dan, he said, Dan is a lion's whelp that leaps from Bashan" (Deuteronomy 33;22)
  The period of the Judges was a cruel age and even one setback could have near fatal consequences. This explains how and why the Tribe of Dan would suddenly come, like a leaping lion, conquer and when beaten be forced to move on, to conquer elsewhere.

Assyrian Empire


                The Book of Judges (chapter 18) relates how 600 men from Dan in the south went north and found a place named Laish whose inhabitants lived like Sidonian-Phoenicians. They conquered Laish, wiped out the inhabitants, and renamed the place Dan.
"In those days there was no king in Israel and the tribe of the Danites was looking for territory to occupy, because they had not so far come into possession of the territory allotted to them among the tribes of Israel. The Danites therefore sent out five fighting men of their clan  from Zorah and Eshtaol  to prospect. The five men went on their way and came to Laish. There they found the inhabitants living a carefree life, in the same way as the Sidonians, a quiet carefree folk, with no hereditary king to keep the country under his thumb. They were a long way from the Sidonians and had no contact with the Aramaeans.....
                "And so six hundred men from the clan of the Danites set out from Zorah and Eshtaol. They went up country and encamped in Kiriath jearim, in Judah: this is why that place to this day is called Mahaneh dan [i.e. "The Camp of Dan"]; it lies west of Kiriath jearim. From there they passed on to the hill country of Ephraim and came to Micah's house.
                ".....The five men entered Micah's house and took the idol and image, ephod and teraphim......
                "Thus they carried off the priest and things Micah had made for himself,  and attacked Laish....They put them to the sword and set fire to the city....the city was in the vale near Beth Rehob. They re built the city and settled in it, naming it Dan after the name of their forefather Dan, a son of Israel; but its original name was Laish. The Danites set up the idol, and Jonathan son of Gershom, son of Moses [other versions: Menasseh] and his sons were priests to the tribe of Dan until the people went into exile. They set up for themselves the idol which Micah had made, and it was there as long as the House of God was at Shiloh" (Judges chapter 18).

                The Book of Joshua related a very similar account which should be considered since we believe (contrary to most others) that an entirely different situation is being discussed:

  "And the coast of the children of Dan went out [(too little)] for them: therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem, and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and possessed it, and dwelt therein, and called Leshem, Dan, after the name of Dan their father" (Joshua 19;47).         

                Both versions relate how the inheritance of the children of Dan in the south was either too small for them (Joshua ch.18) or how they had not taken possession of that which had been allocated to them (Judges ch.19). Both tell how Danites went north seized a city, slew its inhabitants and re-settled it naming it after DAN  their father.

                There are however several differences between the two accounts:                    

1. In the Book of Joshua the children of Dan had received an inheritance in the south but it was insufficient for them and so they went to fight against Leshem. In Judges though the Danites were in the region of Zorah and Eshtaol (in the south) they had yet not taken possession of their own.

2. In Judges, at least at first, only six hundred went forth after receiving the report of a reconnoitering mission: on the other hand, the Book of  Joshua may be understood to say that all (or nearly all) of Dan went to fight.

3. In the Book of Joshua the city taken is called Leshem: In Judges the city is called LAISH. Some Commentators have tried to state that "Leshem" and "Laish" are different forms of the same word but "leshem" in Hebrew is a type of precious stone (maybe amber) while "laish" means a young male lion.
                 As stated, most (IF NOT ALL) Commentators  have assumed that the accounts in the Books of Joshua and Judges are relating to one and the same event and that Leshem and Laish are variations of the same name. Nevertheless, it now seems certain that LESHEM and LAISH were two different places!


                The place called Leshem and renamed Dan in the Book of Joshua appears to be the site of DAN in northern Galilee otherwise known as Daphne. On the other hand, LAISH which was also renamed DAN and is recalled in the Book of Judges is identical with a centre which gave its name to LUASH of the DANANU! LUASH adjoins Smal of Cilicia in modern southeast Turkey. The distance on foot between the two locations, Leshem of Dan in the northern Galilee and Luash of the Dananu in north Syria, is more than three hundred miles!!       

                The identification of Luash with Liash involves identifying the Dananu who lived in or besides Luash with the Danites of Israelite Dan.

Ptolemy: Gauzan

1.             The area hereby identified as that within which Liash-Dan is to be found is that known in ancient times as the Kingdom(s) of Smal of the Dananu and of Yadi and of Luash and Hamath. This encompassed the areas in Ptolemy's Map (of Arabia Deserta and Syria) depicting Chalybonitis, Cyrrestica, Commagena, Cilicia, and extending into Armenia Minor. To the east and southeast of this region  were the territories of Bathanaei and Bathanaea Regio (i.e. Kingdom of Bathanaea) and Bathan is an Aramaic ("Syrian") pronounciation of BASHAN. Moses had blessed the Tribe of Dan (Deuteronomy 33;22): "Dan is a lion's whelp, he shall leap from Bashan". The area of Luash may also be considered part of Bashan. "LIASH" means young male lion and therefore connects with the expression "Dan is a lion's whelp", i.e. Dan is a young  "Liash" leaping forth from the Bashan: Luash-Liash may be considered a geographical extension, a "leaping forward" from the area denoted as Bathan or Bashan.


2. The names LIASH and LUASH are similar. The place-name Luash is renderable as "LA'AS" which is close in sound to "Liash".

3. Near Luash was the entity of Yadi which was an enclave of Judaeans adjoining the Dananu of Smal and usually ruled  by the same monarch. "Yadi" is referred to as "Hamath" which was restored to "Judah in Israel" (2 Kings 14;28) meaning that part of Judah that was attached to the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Dan and Judah were neighbours in both north and south Israel. Dan in the south had centred on the port of Joppa and adjoined the territory of Judah. In the northern Galilee Judaeans in Gilead of Machir are believed to have bordered Dan and to be those named "Judah upon Jordan toward the sunrising" in the Book of Joshua (19;34).  In Jewish tradition Judah and Dan are often juxtapositioned. Samson the superman-hero came from the Tribe of Dan but his mother was from Judah. Samson, in some respects, was considered a forerunner of the Messiah who will come from Judah but his mother, according  to the Midrash, will be of the Tribe of Dan. Both Judah and Dan  were represented by a lion, though Dan has additional symbols such  as the snake and dragon.

                THE BIBLE MENTIONS YAIR OF JUDAH (DEUTERONOMY 3;14) IN THE BASHAN. YAIR WAS CONNECTED BOTH WITH MENASSEH AND WITH THE CHELUBIE OF JUDAH. THE CHELUBIE ARE RECALLED IN CHALYBONITIS which was to the northwest of Bathanae (Bashan) on Ptolemy's Map. Yair  was mentioned in Assyrian inscriptions as the IARI in the region of Chalybonitis and the surrounding area (including at times in Gauzanitis and elsewhere) raiding and waging wars on both sides of the Euphrates River. Since Yadi was settled by Judaeans and these were united with the Dananu so is the case strengthened for the Dananu having come from Dan in Israel. (This may seem obvious, but it is still not conventionally entirely recognised). The name Yair is often transliterated as "Jair".                       
                "Jair the son of Menasseh  took all the country of Argob  unto the coasts of Geshuri and Maachathi; and called them after his own name Bashan Havoth Jair, unto this day" (Deuteronomy 3;14).   
                Hezron (son of Judah) begat both Chelubai and Segub the father of Jair. Jair was therefore the nephew of Chelubai and familial relationships often presaged political and settlement combinations amongst the descendants (1 Chronicles 2:3,4,9,21,222,23).
4. In both accounts the conquered and re-settled city is renamed DAN "after the name of their forefather Dan a son of Israel". This may reflect a Tribal characteristic  and some have interpreted the phrase "Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path .." (Genesis 49;16)  as referring to a Tribal Trait of leaving their namesake everywhere like the trail of a snake print showing the wriggling of his passage, e.g. "Mahaneh Dan" (Judges 18;12), Don, Daneister, Danaper, Danube, Denmark, Dannonia....

5. Laish "was in the valley that lieth by Beth Rehob" (Judges 18). Beth Rehob is identifiable with "REHOB" in the northern territory of the Tribe of Asher (Joshua 19;28, 30) and as "Rehob as men come to Hamath" (Numbers 13;21). HAMATH is the name of an area and the city of Hamath (said Rashi) is identical with that known as Antiochea on the Orontes River in north Syria. Hamath was a kingdom which may have included HOMS in east Syria but nevertheless Scripturally should be identified more with the area of Antiochea which was more to the north. Similarly DAMASCUS was far to the north near (or in Cilicia) and not Damascus of today. Eliyahu ("The Gaon") of Vilna (ca.1700 c.e.)  (on Joshua 19;28) identified REHOB with Beth Rehob and placed the border of Asher in the north by Hamath, Antiochea and  "Damascus of the North" which was near Cilicia in southeast Turkey. |Nadav Naaman  ("Hazael of Amqi and Hadadezer of Beth-Rehob" UF27 (1995) has also shown that Beth-Rehob was identiqal with Amqi in Northwest Syria by the presentday Turkish border adjoining Cilicia.

                The Yadi ruled over the Mushkabim who (according to a bi-lingual Phoenician-Hittite inscription) are apparently identical with the Moshki or people of Mopsus who were also subjects of the Dananu king. The names Mushkabim and Moshki support the notion that Smal and Yadi are identical with the Biblical Da-Meshek i.e. Damascus:- "Damascus [i.e. Da-Meshek] and Hamath to Judah in Israel" (2 Kings 14;28). Both the Danites and Yadi of Judah ruled over the same subject Moshki people who later were known as Muski and are identified with the Phrygians. There were periods when both the Dananu and Yadi were ruled by the same monarch. At some stage they separated, Kalamu a king of Yadi backed the subject Mushkabim (i.e. Moshki) against the Baririm or nobility of his own people and also enlisted Assyrian help against the Dananu. The ultimate result was that both kingdoms were destroyed and the Yadi and Dananu exiled. Centuries later the Jutes (from "Yadi"?) were to settle in Denmark and a Danish tradition traced the Jutes to Judah and the Danes to Dan.

6. In the Book of Ezekiel (48;1) it says concerning the future apportionment of the Promised Land amongst the Israelite Tribes,
"From the north end to the coast ..as one goes to Hamath...the border of Damascus northward, to the coast of Hamath..a portion for Dan".
This verse according to Commentaries indicates that Dan is destined to receive a portion stretching beyond Hamath (Antiochea on the Orontes) and into the region northward of it. This Millenial Promise seems to have had an historical precedent.

7.             The Orontes enters the Mediterranean Sea at Antiochea (modern: Antakya) in northern Syria. North of the Orontes River were the lands of Alasiya or Luash (i.e. Liash).  Zakir, the King of Hamath in one inscription bears a Hebrew name and uses a type of Aramaic influenced by Hebrew. He is entitled "King of Hamath and LUASH". Zakir also ruled over Chazrik in this same region.

8.             The king of Sma'al in the valley north of ASI (Orontes embouchemont) on the edge of LUASH (LIASH) called himself "KING of the DANIM" i.e. of the Danes of Dan. The Danes (Dananu) also controlled the neighbouring area of Cilicia and at one stage their capital was Adana by Tarsis of Cilicia and their suzerainity reached as far north as Karatepe. A bi-lingual inscription of theirs found at Karatepe employs a Phoenician type of Hebrew and a version of Hittite. Branches of the Hittites in Anatolia neighboured the Dananu of Cilicia. This northern portion of Dan is referred to variously as Dananu, Danau, Denye, Denyen, Danuna. They are probably identical with the original Danaioi of Classical Greek writings.        

9. A Phoenician inscription discovered in 1855 in a cave outside of ancient Sidon speaks in the name of "Ashmunezer king of Sidon". The  text is of unknown date and may be copied from an original written anytime in the period 1000 b.c.e. to 600 b.c.e. The text is transmitted by A.Markuswho claimed that the Phoenician form of Hebrew appears like a foreign language in the Phoenician mouth and did not sit easily with them. Nevertheless, about half the words are Hebrew words and are comprehensible (with some effort) to a Hebrew reader. The text may be translated directly approximately as follows:
                (18) ......The Lord of the Kings exiled and gave unto us (19) Doar (i.e. Dor) and Jaffo lands of the mighty Dagan  which are of the root of Dan, who were experienced in power, which he exercised and added the port (20) onto the borders of my lands to regulate my land for ever".

                The inscription appears to link Dan with Dagan god of the Philistines. It testifies to the prestige the Tribe of Dan once held in those maritime parts. It links Dan with both Dor and Jaffo off the coast of Israel and thus with the Sea Peoples. This inscription recalls the Biblical Statement which speaks of a time when the Phoenicians of Sidon and others oppressed Israel: "The Sidonians also, and the Amalekites, and the Maonites, did oppress you; and ye cried to me, and I delivered you out of their hand" (Judges 10;12). It is interesting to note that the Maonites ("Maoni")  were a people who lived to the east of Israel as well as in Lydia (northwest Turkey) where they were seafarers.

10.           The names by which the Dananu (Denye, etc.) are known are those which would be expected in foreign parts for Dan. There is an identity between the Danaoi of Greek tradition, the Dananu of Cilicia, and Dan of Israel*24.

11.           Egyptian accounts of the Dananu connect them with the northern region of Israel, with Cilicia, Cyprus, and with other groups whose names and characteristics appear Hebraic and with the Philistines who neighboured (and at times controlled) the Tribe of Dan in the south.

12.           The Danaioi of Greek Mythology were described by the Greeks as having come out of Egypt and as  being brothers to the Jews. This identifies the Danaioi of Greek tradition with Dan of Israel. The Danaioi are associable with the Danuna of Cilicia.

13.           Greek sources speak of the people of Mopsus of Anatolia who have been identified (thanks to a bi-lingual inscription) with the Dananu of Cilicia. The "people of Mopsus" (i.e. the Dananu) in legendary accounts also parallel Dan of Israel and Samson the judge hero of Dan.
14.           The Dananu ruled Cyprus which was named "Yadnana" ("Isle of the Dana") in their honour. Other sources indicate a strong Israelite influence in Cyprus at some time or other. Culturally Cyprus was very much a Phoenician island. This shows the possibility of an overlap between Dan and the Phoenicians.

15.           Mutual cultural influences between northern Syria, Cilicia, Anatolia, and Israel confirm the impression of close contact between these regions consistent with colonisation of Israelites in the north..  
16.           The Tribe of Dana (Tuatha de Danaan) according to different accounts of Irish Mythology had been in both the northern land of Israel and in the area of Greece and displays Israelite characteristics. Taking the facts at their face value a simple solution is available concerning the identity of the Tribe of Dana in Irish Mythology: The Dana of the Irish were Israelites from the Tribe of DAN and probably at least contained elements from the Dananu in Smal who were also from Dan of Israel.

17.           Solinus  said that before the rise of Assyria, Cilicia was one of the four great powers of Asia. Cilicia was the region from which the Dananu made their power effective.


 The Tribe of Dan in the land of Israel were seafarers from an early stage:
"Why did DAN remain in ships?" (Judges 6;7) asked the Prophetess Deborah.
The Prophet Ezekiel linked Dan together with Javan (i.e. Ionia in west Anatolia or Greece in general) as trading with Phoenician Tyre:
 "Dan also and Javan going to and fro occupied in the fairs: bright iron, cassia, and calamus, were in thy market" (Ezekiel 27;19).
The above verse is alternatively translatable (from the Hebrew) as saying:
"Dan and Yavan from Uzzal were your sub-contracting intermediaries, they produced iron manufactures, alloyed, and in bars. They were amongst your guarantors" (Ezekiel 27;19).
  Cilicia was one source of iron and the Dananu were in Cilicia.
The chief port of Cilicia was Tarsis. Long after the Danites had departed, Samson, the deliver-hero of Dan, was still worshipped in Tarsis under the name of Sandon.


                 Danaus: Greek tradition related how Danaus after coming out of Egypt came with his daughters to Greece whereas his brothers went to Jerusalem. In Greece the daughters of Danaus intermarried with the local aristocracy and their children became rulers. In honour of Danaus the local Pelasgian Ionian Greeks renamed themselves DANAIOI by which term the early Greeks are often referred to by Homer, though some say that by "Danaoi" Homer was referring more to a specific ruling warrior class..

"Danaus, the father of fifty daughters on coming to Argos took up his abode in the city of Inarchos and throughout Hellas [i.e. Greece] he laid down the law that all people hitherto named Pelasgians were to be named Danaans" (Strabo 5.2.40 quoting Euripides ca. 480-406 BCE).

 Diodorus Siculus (i;28;1 5; 90-27 BCE) reported:
                "They say that those who set forth with Danaus, likewise from Egypt, settled what is practically the oldest city of Greece, Argos, and that the nations of the Colchi in Pontus and that of the Jews, which lies between Arabia and Syria, were founded as colonies by certain emigrants from their country..."
i.e. This source is implying that Danaus had the same origin as the rest of Israel.

                 The Philistines are believed to have been of the same stock as the Greek Pelasgians and the term "PELAST" (meaning Philistine) in early Greek inscriptions is considered interchangeable for Pelasgian. As suggested, the struggle of the Danites with the Philistines within the Land of Israel may be somehow connected with the coming of the Danaoi to Greece. There is an opinion that the Danaioi formed a peculiar military class amongst the Mycenean Greeks. At all events the Greek account may be understood as saying that a small number of DANITES came to Greece, intermarried with local rulers, gave their name to an early already present segment of the population, and not much more than that.

                Archaeologists now believe that an offshoot  of the Hyksos, about the time when they were expelled from Egypt came to Greece, conquered it, and laid the basis for Mycenean civilisation. They identify these Hyksos with the Danaioi of Greek tradition. This version also infers that the Danaioi were relatively few in numbers though qualitatively determinative.


                The Dananu of Cilicia were to be connected in Greek Mythology with a hero named Mopsus. Mopsus in turn was linked with Daphne and Apollo. The legendary Daphne was the supposed mother of Mopsus and she had established the colony of Colophon in Ionia. Ionia was in western Anatolia (modern Turkey) opposite Greece. Most of Ionia belonged to Javan and the two names ("Yavan" and "Ionia") are essentially the same. To the east of Ionia was originally a Hittite Empire which was destined to be destroyed and ultimately replaced by Lydians and Phrygians and others. The time of destruction of the Hittite Empire was around that of the Dorian invasions of Greece, the Sea peoples' attacks on Egypt and maybe the destruction of Troy. Troy was to the southwest of Ionia. Troy overlooks the Hellespont (Dardanelles) where according to Saxo Grammaticus once existed a settlement named Dan whence the Danites sailed to Scandinavia.


                Apollo was originally a Hittite thunder god who in Greek Mythology through Daphne fathered Mopsus. From his base in Colophon (Ionia) Mopsus joined a group returning from the Trojan War. Mopsus founded colonies in southern Anatolia (Aspendus) and in Cilicia. Strabo (14;4;3) said that the Tribe of Mopsus invaded the eastern Mediterranean area and settled the coasts of Cilicia, Syria, and Phoenicia. Mopsus wandered about with his band of warriors, was famous for his riddles, and according to Xanthus died in Ashkelon of snakebite. The Danite hero, Samson was also famous for his riddles (Judges 15;12), and gave his life apparently in Gaza (Judges 16;21) which like Ashkelon was a Philistine city not far from Gaza. Samson's death was caused by his deliberately collapsing the two supporting pillars of the building he was in, in order to destroy its occupants at that moment. In Talmudic tradition Samson's death was likened to that of a snake who bites the horse's heel in order to kill the rider but is himself crushed by the horse collapsing upon him.
  "Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that bites the horse's heels, so that his rider shall fall backward" (Genesis 49;17).
The Talmud (Jerushalemi Sotah 9;b-10;a) adduced additional reasons for likening Samson to a snake by the wayside which strengthen the similarity between Mopsus and Samson of Dan.

                The Tribe of Dan as described in the Bible may also well be likened to a wandering group of warriors. If the equation Dan and Dananu is accepted then (like the people of Mopsus) the Danites did settle along the coasts of Syria, Phoenicia, and Cilicia and from one point of view these places are merely different parts of the Land of Israel. The mother of Mopsus was called Daphne which according to Josephus was the name given to a spot at the head reaches of the Jordan River on which the centre of DAN IN THE GALILEE was founded. It was on this spot that King Jeroboam ben Nebat set up one of his golden calves for the Ten Tribes to worship. Incidentally, the Heraclidae (Sons of Hercules) who led the Dorian invasion of Greece believed themselves descended from Hercules and a slave girl named JARDANUS (Herodotus 1;7). This name is derived from the Hebrew "Jordan". One Talmudic explanation of this name (applied to the Jordan River) was "Descend (Yored) from Dan". The Geographical location of Dan  in the Galilee contains a spring which is one of the sources of the River Jordan.  Josephus says that Dan in the Galilee was also known as "Daphne" which was the name given to the mother of Mopsus! Another form of the name Samson is Sandon which is the name given to the patron-idol of Tarsis in Cilicia and probably identical with Mopsus.


                The Dananu were at first centred in Smal to the east of Cilicia. In the 700s BCE the centre of the Dananu moved to Adana in Cilicia though Smal remained important. Dananu suzerainity stretched to the north in east Anatolia and reached at least to Karatepe to the north of Cilicia. After the destruction of the Hittite Empire, small neo-Hittite states had arisen in northern Syria. They were of Hittite culture and influenced the Dananu. From the Danau centre of Karatepe has been found a bi-lingual text using both a Hittite tongue and a form of Phoenicianised Hebrew. The King of Karatepe identifies himself as ruler of the Dananu and says he is descended from "the house of MPS". This appellation ("MPS") has been equated with the Greek rendition of MOPSUS. At all events, MOPSUS was considered a term of royalty in the Cilician area and an important region (by the coast) was known as "Mopsopia".    "MOPSOS" appears also to have been a title given to the idol SANDON who was equated with Hercules and worshipped in Cilicia. The name Sandon is probably a dialectical version of Samson. Legends concerning Hercules are based on identical themes to those in the story of Samson. Hercules was the great grandson of Perseus and Perseus a descendant of Danaus of Greek Mythology. Perseus,said the Greeks, conquered the city of Jaffo (in the Land of Israel) and married Andromeda the daughter of the King of Ethiopia who then ruled there. Jaffo was the area originally bequeathed to the Tribe of Dan and which the Tribe of Dan unsuccessfully attempted to conquer and settle before directing their attentions elsewhere.
                From the above it may therefore be so far concluded that the Tribe of Dan AT FIRST for a time settled in the south of Israel. Many of the Danites went later to Dan of the Galilee. A small but significant number went even further north to Smal and Cilicia. A band of adventurers from Dan apparently also reached Greece and contributed to the ruling class and some type of intermittent connection between Dan and Greece may have existed. They also seem to have probably established a few scattered settlements in areas of Anatolia AND ESPECIALLY IN CILICIA (in present-day southeast Turkey). The kings of Smal in Cilicia were Dananu. They ruled over both Smal and Yadi from the 880s BCE (if not well before) and had Semitic names. Some portion of the Dananu remained in Smal until the Assyrians exiled them. They may never have been much more than a minority ruling over another people whom they subjected.

                There are Scriptural indications that many from Dan in Laish (i.e. the Dananu) went into exile at an early date. The account in Judges (chapter 17) which tells of the Danites taking Laish tells how the Danites took with them a graven image. This idol had formerly been in the house of Micah in the territory of Ephraim. It had been attended to by a Levite named Yehonathan who previously had promised their emissaries a successful mission. The Danites in their journey to Laish also took Yehonathan the Levite along with the idol and assorted appurtenances used in the idolatrous (or semi-idolatrous) cult. As recounted, the Danites conquered Laish, burnt it, and renamed it DAN after "their father who was born to Israel".

    "And the children of Dan  set up the graven image; and Jonathan the son of Gershom, the son of Menasseh, he and his sons  were priests to the tribe of Dan until the day of the captivity of the land.
                "And they set them up Micah's graven image, which he made, all the days that the house of God was in Shiloh" (Judges 18;30-31).

 Shiloh and the Tabernacle were destroyed by the Philistines in about 1000 BCE. The above verse seems to link the time of "the captivity of the land" with the presence of the Tabernacle at Shiloh [Judges 18;30-31 i.e. until about 1000 BCE. The Hebrew original for "captivity of the land" is "Galut Ha-aretz" or literally, `The Exile of the Country'. It follows that part of the Tribe of Dan may have been exiled already in ca.1000 BCE. Also in the south (around Jaffo) there appears to have been an early evacuation or exile of the Danites.
                The Tribe of Dan apparently specialised in metallurgy. Aholiab (Exodus 31;6) and Hiram (2-Chronicles 2;13) who were expert artisans and metal workers  both  are linked in Scripture with the Tribe of Dan. Archaeological findings reveal the existence in Dan of the Galilee of a metal industry dating from the Time of Israelite Conquest (Late Bronze Age) to at least the 800s BCE. This industry specialized at first mainly in bronze and afterwards also in iron. Bronze is an alloy of copper and tin both of which in the Egyptian period were obtainable from the Sinai Peninsula. Other areas in Israel also supply copper as did Cilicia and the Caucasus area. Much of the tin  (possibly the greater part) came from Britain. Herodotus (ca.450 BCE) gives the impression that all the tin of his time was produced in British Isles. An interruption in the supply of tin (preventing Bronze production) is believed to have induced the Iron Age in this area. Iron was available from Cilicia and elsewhere. The Sea Peoples (with whom the Dananu were associated) were considered sophisticated copper smelters and workers.

                Dan in the Galilee was destroyed in the 800s BCE by attacks from the Aramaean kingdoms to the north. Part of an inscription in Archaic Aramaic has been found on the site of Dan in the Galilee: From what can be understood from this inscription it may be inferred that the Aramaic (Syrian) monarch is stating that formerly the Israelites had been in the land of his father. Guided by the storm god Hadad (a form of Baal) he (i.e. the king of Syria) came against Israel and slew many including a King of Israel who was descended (he says) from the House of David. He apparently laid waste to Dan. Dan is known to have been attacked by the Syrian monarch ben Hadad in 815 BCE and after that was unheard of.       



                 "Why did Dan remain in ships?" (Judges 5;17).

                "Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel" (Genesis 49;16) 

                "And they called the name of the city Dan, after the name of Dan their father who was born unto Israel" (Judges 18:29).

                 The question that arises from the above is why in the case of Dan (and not of the other tribes) there arises a need to affirm that Dan "was born unto Israel"? Also why say that Dan will be: "as one of the tribes of Israel"?  as if at some stage there was doubt on the matter? Some free-thinking "authorities" adopted the view that the Tribe of Dan was originally a foreign body. They identified the original Danites with the Danaoi of Greece and the Dananu of Cilicia, and then say that somehow this originally foreign group was engrafted amongst the Tribes of Israel. These notions are against the simple message of the Bible and do not accord with the evidence. Nevertheless, the fact that the idea could be feasibly raised, considered, and in some academic circles tentatively accepted emphasises the impression that Dan was somehow different. Dan  in the land of Israel adopted foreign customs different to those of most of Israel and too went into exile at an early stage.
                It was noted above that Eldad HaDani in the 800s c.e. related a tradition that some time after the northern Ten Tribes under Jeroboam (928-907 BCE) seceded from Judah there erupted hostilities between the two halves of the Israelite nation. Rather than engage in a fratricidal conflict the Tribe of Dan went into exile of their own accord, i.e. they left the Land before the Assyrians came down and took away the rest of the Northern Israelites..

                The estrangement of Dan is referred to in the "Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs". This literary work was first written in Judaea in ca.135 BCE but was later heavily doctored by Christian editors. It contains alleged statements of the Tribal Patriarchs and some parts of it may reflect genuine tradition. It quotes Dan forefather of the Tribe of Dan  as prophesying of his sons,
                "That they should forget their God, and should be alienated from the land of their inheritance and from the race of Israel, and from the family of their seed" (vii.3).
                The wording of the above "forget" ... "alienated" ..."from the race of Israel"  .."from the family of their seed"  could be taken as hinting at an alienation (through earlier exile?) from Israel as a whole beyond and before that experienced by the Lost Ten Tribes as a whole.
                The mentioned sources above support the notion that at least part of Dan may already have been in exile long before his fellow North Israelite Tribes went into exile in 730-720 BCE.

"In the period of the Judges there were wars and many were exiled among the nations of the world" (Commentary of "HaNatziv" on Numbers 24;7).

For More about Dan go to:

Selected Articles Concerning the Tribe of Dan


For more information on Brit-Am contact:

Yair Davidiy
POB 595
Jerusalem 91004