Details on How To Contribute to Brit-Am
http://britam.org/contribute-Brit-Am.html
Brit-Am Now no. 1671.
Movement of the Ten Tribes of Israel.
24 March 2011, 18 Adar-Sheni 5772.
1. Brit-Am YouTube Clips.
2. Brian Patmore: Prince William will honour Israelite tradition!
3. Edward Anderson: Ephraim would be a Company of Nations!
4. New Article: The Ephraim-Manasseh Settlement of the USA
by David Jackson.
5. Reply to Will Benedetti re Ephraim and Manasseh.
|
Brit-Am Discussion Group 
|
Contents by Subject |
Research Recognition Reconciliation Contribute |
|
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
 This Site |
1. Brit-Am YouTube Clips
To see the YouTube of Brit-Am Clips go to:
yairdavidiy's Channel
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=yairdavidiy
This gives the number of views per clip and other possibilities.
OR
go to the Brit-Am Article:
Brit-Am YouTube Video Clips
http://britam.org/videoclips.html
Some may find the arrangement here more congenial.
2. Brian Patmore: Prince William will honour Israelite tradition!
Re NJN-16.
New Jerusalem News.
#3. Royal wedding to include Jewish custom by Ilan Mester
http://britam.org/NJN/NJN16.html#Royal
Shalom Yair,
Is it not fitting that Prince William will honour Israelite tradition during his wedding, given that through his mother he is descended from the ancient Scottish and Irish Kings, who carry the lines of Zerah (the Red Hand coat of arms on the Flags of Ulster and many other counties as well) plus the line of Pharez ?
Truly this can mark a stronger bond with Yisrael and more of a concern for all that live back in the land.
Maybe also an encouragement to all living back home in these the last days before the Restoration of All Things so longed for by all.
Congratulations to the young Prince and his bride and Hallelujah for Abba and Yisrael !!!
Shalom,
Brian
3. Edward Anderson: Ephraim would be a Company of Nations!
Re: Brit-Am Now no. 1670
#1. "Globetrotter" : Thoughts on Ephraim and Manasseh.
http://britam.org/now2/1670Now.html#Globetrotter
Hello Yair,
I have just 2 comments about your last Brit-Am posting.
First to John/Globetrotter in article #1. The Appalachian Mountains run from north Georgia all the way into Vermount. The New England States were settled mainly by those of English descent, while from Virginia on down were settled mainly by the Scots/Irish. We just celebrated St. Patrick's Day here in Savannah, Georgia and it is the second largest celebration on the east coast. One cannot or should not determine "origins" by population alone as that can be very misleading. America is LOADED with millions of foreigners, and more are poring over our borders every day. It won't be too many more years and the English/Scots/Irish population will become extint!!! The Scriptures state that Manasseh would be a GREAT Nation and that Ephraim would be a Company of Nations or "Commonwealth" if you please, and Britain HAS fulfilled that, NOT America. In fact, even TODAY, Britain still has sway over 25% of the land surface of this earth!!! I think these facts speak for themselves, not to mention all of the historical work in Yair's books and others.
4. New Article:
The Ephraim-Manasseh Settlement of the USA
by
David Jackson
http://www.britam.org/Jackson.html
[Plentiful Maps]
Extracts:
Fischer writes that there were four primary migrations from Britain
...leading up to the creation of the United States and the American Revolution.
(1) The earliest Englishsettlers came to Jamestown and points south. These
people primarily came from southern England. ...Geographically these people would primarily be
Saxon and therefore Ephraimite....
(2) The next wave was the Puritans, settling in Boston and points north.
... These people came primarily from East Anglia or
eastern England and London. These people would therefore, per the received
tradition, be mostly Angles rather than Saxons.... the Angles are associated with Manasseh.
(3) The next big wave came from the British midlands and settled in
Pennsylvania and Delaware. They were Quakers. ...the
Mercians who settled the old English midlands were essentially Angles...this would make them out of
Manasseh as well.
(4) The last of these early Protestant waves were the Scots-Irish.
...They had originally come from the border area between northern
England and southern Scotland. ...The majority of these people settled in what was called the
US 'backcountry' - Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, and the western Carolinas.
Having come from northern England, they were definitely Anglo/Scandinavian
and not Saxon... So the US was primarily settled by Angles, but with substantial Saxon
representation, most notably in the South.
The US Civil War was largely a war between groups (2 Puritans) and (3
Quakers) against (1 Southerners), with group (4 Scots-Irish) somewhat split
but mostly siding with (2) and (3).
Modern culture tends to group areas controlled by (1) with (4), and indeed
recent Presidential voting patterns bear this out.
... I believe that US culture has been mostly influenced by
Angle/Manasseh elements, with Saxon/Ephaimite elements playing a significant
but ultimately inferior role.
5. Reply to Will Benedetti re Ephraim and Manasseh.
Will Benedetti wrote:
>1. "Globetrotter" : Thoughts on Ephraim and Manasseh.
>RE: Brit-Am Now no. 1669
>#4. Ephraim also in USA? Perhaps Ephraim is
>Numerically greater in America than Manasseh?
>http://britam.org/now2/1669Now.html#Ephraim
>Shalom Yair
>In addition to the prophecy and wording of Gen 48:19, Moses adds greater
detail in the Book of Deuteronomy.
>Deu 33:17(NKJV) His [Joseph's] glory is like a firstborn bull, And his horns
like the [two] horns of the wild ox [interestingly the KJV renders this
'unicorns']; TOGETHER with THEM HE shall PUSH THE PEOPLES (Heb. 'am - refers
to both Israelites & Goyim) TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH; They are the TEN
THOUSANDS of Ephraim, And they are the THOUSANDS of Manasseh."
Who are the 10,000 and the 1000? The people doing the pushing or the people being pushed? You can't tell from the text. If it is referring to the people being pushed than the UK would be Ephraim.
Brit-Am Reply:
In the Brit-Am Commentary to Deuteronomy 33 we discuss different possibilities.
http://www.britam.org/
deuteronomy/10vezothabraca.html
After going through different commentaries,
this is the rendition of the verse we suggested then:
Deuteronomy 33:17
"He will received his glory from the firstling of his bull which is Ephraim;
His horns (through Menasseh) are immensely powerful like those of a Raem (Unicorn):
With these horns he shall batter other peoples. They (Ephraim and Manasseh) will be together until the ends (extreme points when the Land of Israel is the center) of the earth. And they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, that are multiplied a thousands times over together with those of Manasseh.
This interpretation to our mind still holds well. It fits the literal meaning of the Hebrew original; it accords with several of the major commentaries; it makes sense in the light of Brit-Am studies.
According to this the 10,000s pertain to Ephraim and the 1000s to Manasseh.
There is another point of possible interest:
We read:
1-Samuel 18:
6 Now it had happened as they were coming home, when David was returning from the slaughter of the Philistine, that the women had come out of all the cities of Israel, singing and dancing, to meet King Saul, with tambourines, with joy, and with musical instruments. 7 So the women sang as they danced, and said:
'Saul has slain his thousands, And David his ten thousands.'
8 Then Saul was very angry, and the saying displeased him; and he said, 'They have ascribed to David ten thousands, and to me they have ascribed only thousands. Now what more can he have but the kingdom?'
I heard from a Chazan (Kantor i.e. Professional Reader of Scripture) whose name I have forgotten that according to the reading the women could be understood to have intended:
# Saul slew thousands and together with David additional ten thousands #.
i.e. it could be read to say:
# Saul slew thousands and Saul and David (together) additional ten thousands #.
It was Saul who misunderstood what they were singing.
May we apply this principle to Deuteronomy 33:17?
In such a case:
# They are the ten thousands of Ephraim, And they are the thousands of Manasseh.#
becomes:
# They are the ten thousands of Ephraim, And they are [together amongst] the thousands [and ten thousands?] of Manasseh.#
To Make an Offering to Brit-Am:
http://www.britam.org/
contribute-Brit-Am.html
Pleased with what you read?
Click Here to make an offering. |
'It is impossible to rightly govern the world without
God or the Bible.'
George Washington
Brit-Am is the "still small voice" that contains the truth.
[1-Kings 19:12] AND AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE A FIRE; BUT THE LORD WAS NOT IN THE FIRE: AND AFTER THE FIRE A STILL SMALL VOICE.
| PREVIOUS ISSUES |
 |
 |