rose

"Brit-Am Now"-737
Contents:
1. Brit-Am Biblical Codes Articles Upgraded.
2. DNA Theory Turned on its Head?
Brit-Am Proven Right Once More?
3. Proverbs 6:6-11

1. Brit-Am Biblical Codes Articles Upgraded.
The following articles concerning Brit-Am Biblical Codes
have been improved with new information of some importance added:

The USA in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesAmerica.html

Britain Encrypted in Scripture?
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/BritainCodes.html

Brit-Am in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesBritAm.html

Ireland in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesIreland.html

England in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesAnglia.html

Scotland in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesScotland.html

Ulster in Biblical Codes
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesUlster.html

2. DNA Theory Turned on its Head?
Brit-Am Proven Right Once More?
Brit-Am acknowledges DNA to a limited degree.
DNA can probably help us affirm or modify our researches
but to what degree is uncertain.
DNA according to our understanding contains both an inherited
element and one that is acquired through environmental influence
(actually "triggered off" since potentially it always exists) and then passed on
through heredity.
[Within two years I estimate that mainstream DNA researchers will, with some modification,
have come round to our way of thinking. At the least, leading researchers should have announced
a tendency to think in the direction we have indicated. The present mistaken conceptions should cease soon enough to be able to rationally encompass the increasing amount of new information that does not fit.]
All physical attributes are determined by DNA and therefore DNA is no different
from physical attributes in general.
Just as two people with red hair may well be related but they may also may not be
so too when two people have similar genetical DNA markers though in such a case
there is a high probability that their ancestors lived besides each other at some
stage or other and on that basis alone there is a chance that they are related.
Even this however is not certain.
For more on DNA and Brit-Am see:
http://www.britam.org/Questions/QuesDNA.html

The following example of applied DNA theory
and our reaction to it helps put things in some perspective.

Quotation:
> > In both Asia and in Europe have been found regionally-specific
> > X-Chromosome lineages that pre-date modern humans. It appears
> > that the total replacement part of the OOA-2 theory only
> > applies to the male population.
<<....the sequences which were closest to those of the chimp appeared to have
*more* mutations than the others. These are Nasioi [Papuan] YCC10, Japanese
YCC78 and Chinese YCC66. >>
Crudely but accurately explained in layman's terms:
According to Evolutionary Theory man descended from monkeys.
Conventionally it used to be thought that a super-monkey gave
rise to the first man a portion of whose descendants left Africa and founded branches of
humanity in Asia and Europe.
DNA markers are based on the Y male chromosome, on mtDNA (female)
and other segments of DNA.
The above quotation says that certain monkeys in China, Japan, and Papua-New Guinea
have aspects of DNA that are peculiar to themselves and to the (female) people living in those regions.
They therefore propose in effect that humans in China evolved from Chinese monkeys,
humans in Japan from Japanese monkeys, humans in New Guinea (Papua) from
New Guinea monkeys. This more or less fixed the population of both males and females
but then along came descendants of a super-monkey out of Africa whose males replaced the
local males leaving only the females to retain traces of the local DNA markers also noticeable
in the neighborhood monkeys!
Sound ridiculous?
It is?
The scientists themselves would probably be horrified to see the matter put forward in such
a crude fashion.
Nevertheless, these are the assumptions they are working upon.
Brit-Am would say (based on the evidence and deductions from similar cases) that
monkeys and humans do possess similarities and react similarly to the same environmental influences.
At some stage the environment caused the primates in a certain area
to adapt the DNA markers in question. If one examined the case closely
one could well find similar DNA characteristics in other animals apart from
monkeys and men.

3. Proverbs 6:6-11
[Proverbs 6:6] GO TO THE ANT, THOU SLUGGARD; CONSIDER HER WAYS, AND BE WISE:

[Proverbs 6:7] WHICH HAVING NO GUIDE, OVERSEER, OR RULER,

[Proverbs 6:8] PROVIDETH HER MEAT IN THE SUMMER, AND GATHERETH HER FOOD IN THE HARVEST.

[Proverbs 6:9] HOW LONG WILT THOU SLEEP, O SLUGGARD? WHEN WILT THOU ARISE OUT OF THY SLEEP?

[Proverbs 6:10] YET A LITTLE SLEEP, A LITTLE SLUMBER, A LITTLE FOLDING OF THE HANDS TO SLEEP:

[Proverbs 6:11] SO SHALL THY POVERTY COME AS ONE THAT TRAVELLETH, AND THY WANT AS AN ARMED MAN.
If you do not provide for the future you may be left weanting in your time of need. We should all take heed of this. Unfortunately Brit-Am at the present hardly manages to take care of present needs.
Brit-Am is part of your future.
Do not betray Brit-Am.



Publications
NOW INDEX