Events, happenings, and Opinions Concerning
Israel, Israelites, Judah, and Everyone Else

Jerusalem News-750

Brit-Am TRUTH magazine
"Brit-Am TRUTH"

The periodical magazine
of Brit-Am.
Read About the Hebrew Ancestry
and Future Destiny of many non-Jews
in Western Nations!

Now Available!

 Click Here 


Jerusalem News-750
Date 30th March 2008, 23th Adar-2 5768
1. Britain and France Draw Closer
2. Dutch Film About Islam and Violence Removed Due to Threats of Violence
3. (a) Anti-Semitic Switzerland followed by (b) Brit-Am Comment on Switzerland


Contents by Subject Research
Site Map
Contents in Alphabetical Order
This Site

1. Britain and France Draw Closer
Britain and France can forge an 'entente formidable', says Brown
By Ross Lydall
Political Editor
BRITAIN'S relationship with France can become an "entente formidable", Gordon Brown said yesterday, as the two countries pledged to work together on immigration, defence and the economy.
The Prime Minister's remarks came at the end of a two-day state visit by the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and his new wife, Carla Bruni.

Mr Brown said he believed the visit signified "a new stage in the dynamic relationship between Britain and France", with progress also made on Afghanistan and climate change.

"We believe that, working together, France and Britain can be an even greater force for good, so, if you like, this will be the entente formidable," he said.

2. Dutch Film About Islam and Violence Removed Due to Threats of Violence
(a) For discussion of the film and an apology that the film has had to be removed due to threats on
the personnel of the site and their families.

(b) Extracts from an Arutz-7 article on the film:
Movie Portrays Islam as Violent and Bloodthirsty
by Hillel Fendel
( The long-awaited and controversial movie Fitna, which graphically portrays Islam as a religion seeking to dominate the world and slaughter non-believers, finally debuted on the internet on Thursday night.  

Within two hours of the film's release on Britain's video site, close to two million people had seen it.  More than half of them were from Holland, home to the film's producer, Dutch politician Geert Wilders.

The screening of the movie had been in doubt after the world's largest website name registrar, Network Solutions, decided to block the movie's home site. The decision to censor the film bolstered concerns that the extent of the fear of Islamic violence has even affected WWW content.

On Thursday, the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution against the movie.  Proposed by Islamic countries, the resolutiion passed by a 21-10 vote, over the opposition of Europe and Canada.

Despite all, LiveLeak stepped in to screen the movie, at, explaining, "There was no legal reason to refuse Geert Wilders the right to post his film on, and it is not our place to censor people based on an emotive response."  Many websites feared even to list the URL at which the movie could be seen.

Fitna includes graphic footage of Moslem terror attacks around the world, including beheadings, disfigured bodies, destroyed buses, and the like. The scenes are accompanied by the relevant verses in the Koran, such as, "Prepare for them whatever force and cavalry ye are able of gathering to strike terror, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah and your enemies." This particular verse is followed by clips of a plane slamming into the World Trade Center and setting the building afire, and imams calling for the annihilation of all infidels.

One Moslem cleric is seen calling for the murder of Jews; he unsheathes a sword and cries out in nearly uncontrollable frenzy, "By Allah, we shall cut off the Jew's head!  Allah is great! Allah is great! Jihad for the sake of Allah!"  The audience, in a similar frenzy, cheers him on. 

3. Anti-Semitic Switzerland followed by Brit-Am Comment on Switzerland

Another Tack: No Swiss surprise
Sarah Honig , THE JERUSALEM POST        Mar. 27, 2008
Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and her urbane entourage are reportedly stunned by neutral Switzerland's hardly neutral multi-billion-dollar gas deal with Iran. No sooner had new Swiss ambassador Walter Haffner presented his credentials here last week than he faced a dressing-down by the ministerial Western European Desk chief.

It goes without saying that nothing less than a major upset could have elicited such uncharacteristic ferocity from Tzipi's tame sticklers for protocol. Wringing their hands in disbelief, Israel's diplomats moaned that Switzerland had "sold its principles" for cold, hard cash.

But that's a silly complaint. Switzerland could no more have sold its principles than it could have sold its soul to the devil. For all its syrupy sanctimony, it has no principles - much less a soul. Switzerland is no rookie at playing footsie for profit with genocidal tyrants, especially the sort not overly enamored of Jews.

It has long aspired to match its Alpine chocolate-box prettiness with claims of lofty moral beauty. Neutrality is but one expression of its self-ascribed virtue. The Red Cross is another. Founded and based in Geneva, its stated mission is to alleviate suffering regardless of nationality, race, religion, class or politics. Its passivity - if not far worse - toward European Jewry's bitter fate during the Holocaust is a matter of indisputable record.

Already soon after WWI, goody-goody Switzerland experienced great angst about a dreaded Jewish influx, dubbed at the time uberjudung (over-Judaization). The Swiss penchant for marking personal documents with "Js" or Stars of David was born then. It kicked into extra high-gear when German Jews began to desperately flee the increasingly ominous Third Reich. Compassionate Switzerland was so leery of admitting them that its vetting criteria meshed with Nazi racist designations.

SWITZERLAND'S immigration policy studiously and shamelessly adhered to the letter of the Nuremberg laws. Visas were required of "non-Aryans" and, to erase any possible lingering doubts, Bern persuaded Berlin to stamp the passports of all departing Jews (even if they possessed Swiss citizenship) with a big, glaring red "J." The Swiss government itself publicly apologized for the J-stamp on March 8, 1995.

After the Final Solution was officially inaugurated at Wannsee in 1942, Switzerland closed off its borders altogether. This, judged the Swiss-ordained Independent Commission of Experts (ICE) in its 2002 report, "made it more difficult for refugees to reach safety, and by handing over the refugees caught directly to their persecutors, the Swiss authorities were instrumental in helping the Nazi regime attain its goals."

With no punches pulled, the above means nothing less than collaboration in mass-murder. The Swiss turned away tens of thousands of Jews, sending them to certain, cruel death. Their blood indelibly stains Switzerland's reputation.

Without even touching on the business of banking hanky-panky and greed-gratifying benefits reaped by Switzerland from the incomparable Jewish tragedy, Switzerland did well for itself via exports of war materials to Hitler's Germany, extending it credit, all manner of financial underpinning and loot-laundering services. All this time, Switzerland gloried in resplendent neutrality, which, in the oblique phrasing of the ICE report, was "inappropriately invoked to justify not only decisions made in all kinds of spheres, but also inaction on part of the state."

Clearly yesteryear's Swiss weren't excessively concerned even by the hypothetical risk of protracting the war. Their refrain back in the 1940s was almost identical to current Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey's assertion that "Switzerland is an independent country which has its own strategic interests to defend."

In other words, then as now, if there's a bundle to be made, Switzerland will without compunction trade with pathological Jew-haters - who inter alia also pose imminent danger to the entire free world. It betrayed helpless asylum-seekers and buttressed Hitler's economy despite his blaring threats to annihilate all Jews. Likewise, it helps fortify Ahmadinejad's economy despite his blaring threats to annihilate the Jewish state.

Calmy-Rey has never missed an opportunity to reproach Israel for "disproportionate" responses to any and all terrorist outrages. Concomitantly, she is exceedingly sparing in even the minutest display of sympathy for Israeli suffering. Her selective humanitarianism enables her to pooh-pooh Teheran's nuclear buildup, terror sponsorship and human rights abuses.

In the hallowed name of neutrality she mounted a pilgrimage to Iran to "witness" the signing of that momentous 25-year gas-supply contract.
Sporting a sheer white headscarf - so as not to offend Ahmadinejad's famous sensibilities - she lent a higher profile, prestige and legitimacy to the occasion. Thumbing her nose at fellow western democracies, Calmy-Rey emboldens Ahmadinejad as even few of the more cynical appeasement-minded EU statesmen dare.

BY CALMY-REY'S reckoning, her personal stamp of approval alone suffices to justify and elevate any caprice to the moral high ground. She is the ultimate arbitrator of righteousness. In the name of superior Swiss rectitude, the hyperactive socialist pushed for "alternative negotiations" with Iran, promoted (and financed) the Meretz-brand Geneva Initiative and
advocated that the Red Cross replace the verboten Star of David with a
meaningless red "crystal." Her combination of guile and smile has made her one of her country's more popular politicos, to the extent that she was elected Swiss federal president for 2007. In that capacity she responded to Ahmadinejad's Holocaust-denial conference by proposing in the tactless spirit of her "active neutrality" that Switzerland host no less than an international symposium on "the varying perspectives of the Holocaust." Ahmadinejad was to be invited to voice his version, while Calmy-Rey was, presumably, to hold court as the upright impartial moderator.

Thankfully, the Swiss government was embarrassed enough to nip her notion in the bud. A pseudo-academic deliberation on whether the Holocaust ever took place would have been too discomfiting for the country that capitalized so unstintingly on the enormous Jewish bloodletting. But no such unease limits lucrative commercial ties with the Middle East's Hitler wannabe. These remain as compelling as were the ultra-rewarding transactions with the original WWII-model Fuehrer. Hence Israeli shock is as preposterous as Livni's premise that other states share Israel's goal to isolate rogue regimes. This is no Swiss surprise. Just more of the same.

Brit-Am Comment:

Switzerland consists of a German-speaking section, a French-speaking one and an Italian-speaking one. There is also native language called  Romansch that has affinities to Akkadian,
the language of Ancient Assyria. The German-speaking sections are dominant and originally held the other sections in subjection.
There is and always has been much anti-Semitism in Switzerland.
During the Holocaust years Switzerland did take in some Jewish refugees but mistreated them and exploited them as well as appropriating money that had been deposited in Swiss bank accounts by European Jews whom the Nazis killed.
Per head of population as many leading Nazis were born in Switzerland and moved to Germany as were produced by most German Provinces.
On the other hand Switzerland did have a strong and vigorous anti-Nazi element that was prepared if necessary to wage a Civil War to keep pro-German elements or German invaders from taking over. Switzerland was in a precarious position.
There also always existed a
philo-Israelite element that was sympathetic to the Jews and to Israelite values.
Despite everything our understanding is that within Switzerland there settled a significant proportion of Israelites.
In our work "The Tribes"
we have traced the Israelite input in Switzerland to several tribes but with
Issachar predominating.
We have also found
Issachar in Finland.
The name "
Issachar" derives from the root "sachar" meaning "reward" or "payment".
It is ironic but even the anti-Semitic aspects of Swiss policy appear to be motivated primarily by the desire for reward, i.e. for "payment". Is this  "
Issachar" gone bad?
Or is it non-Israelite elements expressing themselves negatively through Israelite characteristics that have been impressed on their country?

The Lifestyle Doctor

 To See Previous Issues  
Jerusalem News Archives 

Join the Brit-Am Ephraimite Discussion Group
Just Send an
with "Subscribe" in the Subject Line
and in the Message

 Main Page 

 Your Offerings and Orders for our Publications