Please allow me to point out that your identification of Edom is erroneous.
The Bible prophecies are all literal except where it specifically states that it is a parable. Edom is the Jordan and Saudi area.
(Psalms 83:5-8 (HCSB) 5 they have conspired with one mind; they form an alliance against You. 6 the tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites, Moab and the Hagrites, 7 Gebal, Ammon, and Amalek, Philistia with the inhabitants of Tyre. 8 Even Assyria has joined them; they lend support to the sons of Lot. Selah)
When the Romans planned to invade "Germany" (The Northern Part of Gaul) their scouts reported that these people were the ONLY pure race who have not mixed with others. Thus they were well-disciplined, industrious and staunch patriots. To say they are a mixed race looks like an effort to rewrite history.
I think the reference to Germany is largely influenced by the overwhelming propaganda against those people. To follow the lead of the Anti Defamation League, one should have a rule that Germany should not be mentioned without mentioning the role that Theodore Herzle's organisation had in starting both world wars.
Just go and look at the real archives; don't believe what you see written in English. Although the latest laws in France and Germany prohibits the study of the holocaust, they could not prohibit studying all records.
Germany was the first European country to grant full citizenship to Jews (already in 1825). Previously she also afforded protection to Christians who were murdered en masse by the Vatican followers; the only other country to do so was Holland. England was hardly interested. Why do you think the Church Fathers went to Americas: To find freedom for their Christian faith.
Lastly, No other western country has spilled more blood of their own brethren (ten tribes) than Britain.
Beyond The Great Rivers of Cush
Whatever the case, the influence is there and it can be determinative.
You said the Romans called the Germans, "the ONLY pure race who
have not mixed with others".
I am not aware of the Romans noting the purity of the German lineages.
If they did they were mistaken, at least according to DNA.
And if they really did, so what?
What is the big deal?
I remember in my youth in Australia hearing the son of a German immigrant in the name of his father boast that the German language was more pure (i.e. free of foreign accretions) than any other. I doubt that this is true but if it is, does that mean it is better?
Technically the most pure people in Europe in the ethnic sense are probably the Lithuanians and Latvians etc.
And what good does it do them?
Are they noted for anything more than others?
The vehemence many Germans (even liberal ones) often express in defending their ethnic unity is a frequent surprise to foreigners.
It belies the evidence of physical reality (i.e. what can be seen from physical types) as well as that of history, archaeology, and DNA findings.
You accused "Theodore Herzle's organisation" of starting both
By "Theodore Herzle's organisation" you mean the early Zionists.
Before World War 1 the Zionists were not as important as their own propaganda claimed.
Theodore Herzl, their leader, did not even enjoy the benefits of full-time employment. He was a journalist for an Austrian newspaper.
Herzl was constantly worrying that his employers were about to dismiss him and jeopardize support of his family.
These worries may have hastened his death.
Germany was ruled by German aristocrats and business tycoons and later also by underworld sewage.
They bear much of the responsibility for whatever benefits and/or misfortunes the Germans experienced.
For better or for worst the influence of the Jews was really quite marginal.
It could be that the Gentiles subconsciously want the Jews to be more than they are?
Maybe the Gentiles are disappointed that the Jews are not trying to take over the world? That the Jews do not want to tell them what to do? Perhaps this disappointment is sublimated into fantasies of Jewish plots to rule mankind? Alternately it may reflect Edomite ancestry on the part of the Gentiles in question and reflect what they feel the "Chosen People" should be doing?
Historically, the Jews of Germany, Austria, and Hungary were
They performed far above the average in fighting for their countries.
This earned them death for themselves, their children, and womenfolk. Even those who had been severely injured in military service were dispatched. The ones who killed them were those on whose behalf they had been fighting.
Members of the family of my mother in Germany and France were killed by the Nazi Germans.
Every Jew in Europe has similar experiences.
We (i.e. I and others of my acquaintance) have met Germans and others who were in World War -2. We are often not recognized as Jews.
Not every German is a Holocaust denier. Some of them seem quite proud of what was done.
They were not the only ones responsible. They received enthusiastic and jubilant assistance from many others in Europe.
Your attitude of attributing World Wars 1 and 2 to the Zionists is quite popular today in Europe and the USA.
It is known as Conspiracy Theory. The Arabs also believe in it strongly.
We do not blame all Germans. There were and are good Germans.
There were those who were mislead or too weak to resist the elites and gutter-breeds that ruled over them.
They were conditioned over centuries by the lap-pup and hound-dog society around them.
A lot of people in their youth or weaker moments, due to peer pressure etc, do things they would not normally do.
Even so, the Bible requires us take responsibility and if we transgress make atonement.
In the Middle Ages Germany at times was more or less united under the Holy Roman Empire that also ruled over Austria, Hungary, Bohemia (Czechia), etc. Despite Holy Roman Empire hegemony, in practice Germany for most of the time was divided into ca.300 independent or semi-independent polities. These were often openly hostile to each other.
In 1871 the King of Prussia became the Kaiser of the German Empire. This was the real beginning of the nation of Germany as we now know it.
The German People and German national consciousness had however existed for centuries befrehand.
Jews had been in Germany since before the arrival of most Germans.
They were never treated well as far I can tell.
Anything and everything they did or tried to do on behalf of Germany and the Germans was turned against them.
There is a book about the Jews in Germany. It is entitled "The Pity of it All" by Amos Elon. Based on a quick read through some time ago, I would not say the work is exceptional one way or the other. The title however does express a feeling received from the historical experience of German Jews, i.e. one big waste of time.
[This is not altogether true. German Jews have much to be proud of.]
As for Britain, it is true that there does not exist any (or hardly any) nation in the world that Great Britain did not best in warfare.
The British record was still, by the standards of the periods in question, not so bad.
Incidentally our movement, Brit-Am, has (or had?) some supporters and sympathizers in Germany today.
In addition, quite a few of our supporters in North America and South Africa etc are at least partly of German origin.
Our researches indicate that those Germans who emigrated to North America and elsewhere in the 1870s and 1880s etc were of different stock from the bulk of the Germans who remained behind.
|Contents by Subject||
Contents in Alphabetical Order