Details on How To Contribute to Brit-Am
|Contents by Subject||
Contents in Alphabetical Order
Before we begin let us clear up a few points:
1. R1b Not characteristic of Israelites? Environmental Influence.
We do not believe that R1b is necessarily characteristic of Israelites. We doubt it.
We also do not hold that DNA findings are irrefutable. There is much that is not known.
We have mentioned in the past SEVERAL TIMES OVER our opinion that ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE seems to be a factor in determining DNA haplogroups.
Regarding mt[Female]DNA this is now acknowledged.
2. Why DNA Findings Are Used by Brit-Am.
Brit-Am believes that the Lost Ten Tribes are now to be found mainly amongst Western Peoples.
We do not say that everone in these areas is decended from Israel only that descendants of Israelites are to be found amongst them and that that those descendants of Israel are the Lost Ten Tribes.
In some countries these Israelites helped determine aspects of the national character. The same applies to offshoots of these nations overseas in North America, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa.
In the past DNA was used as a point against us.
It was believed that R1b originated in Spain and therefore since a great many West Europeans have R1b, they could not be descended from Israelites.
Today it is acknowledge that R1b originated in Western Asia, i.e. the Near East i.e. in the Area of Ancient Israel.
We will show below that according to present knowledge R1b originated in the general region of Ancient Israel and reached Europe on a large scale only after ca. 700 BCE.
We do not know whether this is correct or not.
It may be mistaken. It is however what the experts now believe.
For the time being, at least, it corresponds with our own researchs based on the Bible and History.
In the same way as in the past DNA findings when they disagreed with Brit-Am could be used against us so too may they be used when they correspond to our own conclusions.
From our point of view many of the present-day carriers of R1b must be descended from Israel. Many others may be descended from other groups. The Ten Tribes after being exiled by the Assyrians moved to the north and then to the west, apart from a portion who were taken directly to the west in ships of the Phoenicians and Minoan-Philistines in concert with Assyrian policy.
It could be that parallel with these movements numerous other peoples also were on the move in the same direction.
This would explain the movement of R1b to the west.
At the least the movement of R1b to the west shows the feasibility of Brit-Am beliefs from the point of view of historical reality.
3. R1b in Europe Today.
Today YDNA haplogroup R1b is the most dominant type in Western Europe.
It accounts for mote than 80% of the males in Ireland and Brittany (west France), 60% in England and east Spain, 40% in West Germany, 25% in Scandinavia, etc.
There are also small groups (once associated with the Khazars) to the east of Russia that have large proportions of R1b. The Bashkirs for instance, in Bashkortostan in Central Asia, have about 84% R1b.
4. Did R1b Originate in Ancient Egypt?
Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA)
A recent DNA test of Tutankhamen, King of Egypt, indicated that he too belonged to R1b. Consequently the Egyptian authorities refused to allow another test to confirm this finding.
Brit-Am Anthropology and DNA Update
#3. Scottii, King Tutankhamen and a Jewish R1b Variant?
R1b is rare in Africa BUT
In some parts of the Cameroons in West Africa a few isolated Black African groups have 95% R1b.
These groups speak the Chadic language that has been associated with Egypt.
It is also worth noting that a closely related haplogroup and possible precursor to R1b is R1# which is found amongst a group of Beduins east of the Dead Sea, in Egypt (ca. 10%), and amongst Australian Aborigines (10%) who may also have come from Egypt.
R1b may have arisen in the Middle East. It is however rare amongst Jews though being found in ca. 10% of Sephardic Jews with some groups (such as Syrian Jews) reaching higher rates.
5. Ancient DNA Findings in General.
YDNA is difficult to extract from archaeological findings. MtDNA is much easier. Nevertheless some YDNA from the past has been analyzed.
The List below shows the major findings up to now of YDNA findings for ALL haplogroups.
Ancient Y chromosome studies
[Note: This blog does not react well to my version of Explorer but it does OK on Mozilla.]
Neolithic Linearbandkeramik from Derenburg [2 F*(xG,H,I,J,K), 1 G2a3]
Neolithic Spain [5 G2a, 1 E-V13]
Neolithic Otzi from the Alps [G2a4]
Prehistoric Alaskan [Q3]
Prehistoric South Siberians from Krasnoyarsk and here [10 R1a1, 1 C(xC3)]
Neolithic southwestern France from Treilles [20 G2a, 2 I2a]
Bronze Age from West Liao-River northern China [N-M231, O3-M122]
Bronze Age from Tarim basin in Xiaohe [7 R1a1a]
Prehistoric Paleo-Eskimo from Greenland [1 Q1a]
Ancient Chinese from the Yangtze River [14 O1, 3 O2a, 7 O3*, 5 O3d, 1 O3e, 18 undetermined]
Ancient nomads from Pengyang China [4 Q]
Eneolithic Corded Ware Germans [3 related R1a]
Bronze Age Lichtenstein Cave in Germany [estimated presence I1b2*, R1a1, R1b1c]
Ancient Mongolian [presence of Tat-C in Yakut and Xiongnu]
Ancient Egyin Gol Mongolians and here and here [Y-STR in Table 2 of second study; N3, Q, C]
Ancient Mongolian Xiongnu [1 R1a1]
Aboriginals from Canary Islands [E-M78, E-M81, J-M267, E-M33, I-M170, K-M9, P-M45, R-M269]
Late Antique Basques [4 I, 2 R1b3d, 19 R1(xR1a1), 2 R-M173]
Medieval Hungarians [Two Tat-C out of four]
Medieval Germans from Ergolding, Bavaria, Germany [4 R1b (two siblings), 2 G2a]
Medieval Germans (?) from Usedom, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany [E1b1b, R1a1a7]
Medieval Swedes from Stockholm [2 I1, probably related]
Recent Frozen Yakuts [8 N1c, 5 non-N1c]
6. Earliest R1b DNA Findings in Europe. The Lichtenstein Cave.
Concerning R1b which is the majority (more than 50%) of YDNA in Western Europe according to the above list we find the earliest in ca. 700 BCE from the Lichtenstein Cave in Lower Saxony of northwest Germany between Denmark and the Netherlands. The DNA was extracted from skeletons that were accompanied by artifacts. Some sources date the finding to ca. 1000 BCE but some of the artifacts were dated later to ca. 700 BCE.
These dates are not that certain and may belong to a later time than that given.
R1b was found in 3 out of 15 different samples that gave results.
Urnfield Culture (c. 1300 BC - 750 BC) finds.
For an article about the Lichtenstein Cave see:
From the Lichtenstein Cave Y R1b DNA was found in 3 out of 15 different samples that gave results.
After that we find R1b amongst Late Antique Basques (500s-600s CE i.e. in Christian times) where it is found in 2 out of 24 samples.
Medieval Germans from Ergolding, Bavaria, Germany [4 R1b (two siblings), 2 G2a] in 600s CE (southwest Germany) where it is 4 out of 6. Here it is higher than the present rate. G2a is now rare in Europe
but common in the Caucasus.
At all events we see that R1b at the beginning was rare. Before ca. 700 BCE there is NO record of it in western Europe but there may have been in Egypt.
Over time its presence in Western Europe increases.
7. Late Appearance of R1b in Western Europe Affirmed Elsewhere. Extracts from Other Sources.
I don't really know when R1b exploded in frequency across Central and Western Europe, but I suspect it was during the Bronze or Iron Age.
How did R1b come to replace most of the older lineages in Western Europe ?
URL Admits that R1b came from Central Asia and Middle East and rerplaced older Yhaplogroups in Europe. Claims this was a male-dominated event and that local females remained.
Until recently it was believed that R1b originated in Western Europe due to its strong presence in the region today. The theory was that R1b represented the Paleolithic Europeans (Cro-Magnon) that had sought refuge in the Franco-Cantabrian region at the peak of the last Ice Age, then recolonised Central and Northern Europe once the ice sheet receded. The phylogeny of R1b proved that this scenario was not possible, because older R1b clades were consistently found in Central Asia and the Middle East, and the youngest in Western and Northern Europe. There was a clear gradient from East to West tracing the migration of R1b people.... This age of the main migration from the shores of the Black Sea to Central Europe also happened to match the timeframe of the Indo-European invasion of Europe, which coincides with the introduction of the Bronze-Age culture in Western Europe, and the spread of Italo-Celtic and Germanic languages.
R1b Dominance Only from Bronze Age
Thus far, the oldest R1b in Europe that we know about is a single R1b individual from the Lichtenstein Cave discovery, circa 1,000 BC. That's Bronze Age.
It is possible to get bogged down in technical considerations.
The bottom line is that R1b has not been found in Europe from before 750 BCE.
Based on the limited findings we have at present it would seem that R1b did not reach its present prominence in Europe until long after the first findings.
R1b originated in the Middle East.
It is now the majority YDNA haplogroup of all nations we identify as having a significant degree of Ten Tribes ancestry and where Israelite Characteristic were to dominate.
In Europe nearly all those countries with the most R1b are those we identify as Israelite and head the list as having the highest proportions of R1b in their populations.
Wales 92%, Ireland 85-90%, France 75%, England ca. 70%.
Exceptions include Spain and Italy (neither of which we consider Israelite nations) with ca. 75% R1b each.
Some Israelite Nations have relatively low
levels of R1b DNA e.g. Norway has only ca. 28%.
All truth passes through three
stages: First it is ridiculed.|
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860).
Pleased with what you read?